First of all it has to be said that I am not a huge fan of Martin Parr. A lot of his images are just not aesthetically pleasing enough to satisfy the perfectionist in me.
That being said, I can definitely appreciate his work. One piece that particularly caught my attention was this:
I was inclined at first to think that this photograph was a cruel joke, but the truth is I would have taken this shot too if I had been given the opportunity. Parr rejects contemporary media's portrayals of carefully airbrushed beauty and instead shoots in his own style, in a way that embraces real life and all it's imperfections. Usually a photographer at such an event as displayed above would seek out the more attractive and expensively dressed persons; Parr alternatively actively looks for the more bizarre, interesting, or even 'grotesque' views - but in reality are his shots grotesque or are they merely truthful?
I think there is a lot of truth in his photography, and I do enjoy some of it, especially because I too as a potentially budding photographer often take photos of less-than-perfect moments, and it's always interesting to see more controversial pieces, and I definitely enjoy some of the satirical humour his work provides in an industry that occasionally lacks levity.